Tuesday, September 26, 2017

Playing Dress-Up: Scooby-Doo 2017

More items from Hallmark's Halloween 2017 product line. These feature characters from Scooby-Doo as dressed as monsters, Scooby as a witch and Shaggy as a vampire.


itty bittys® Scooby-Doo Stuffed Animal (https://www.hallmark.com/gifts/stuffed-animals/itty-bittys/itty-bittys-scooby-doo-stuffed-animal-1KID3376.html)




itty bittys® Shaggy Stuffed Animal (https://www.hallmark.com/gifts/stuffed-animals/itty-bittys/itty-bittys-shaggy-stuffed-animal-1KID3375.html)




Playing Dress-Up: Peanuts 2017

Halloween is a great time to find your favorite characters disguised as monsters, including these products featuring Snoopy from the Peanuts as a vampire. Both items are part of Hallmark's Halloween 2017 product line.


Peanuts® Snoopy and Woodstock Candy Corn Halloween Card (https://www.hallmark.com/cards/greeting-cards/peanuts-snoopy-and-woodstock-candy-corn-halloween-card-299IEH8094.html)


(click link above for image)


Peanuts® Vampire Snoopy Medium Halloween Gift Bag, 9.5" (https://www.hallmark.com/gift-wrap/gift-bags/peanuts-vampire-snoopy-medium-halloween-gift-bag-9.5-199HGB1809.html)






Horrors at Hallmark

Hallmark always has great stuff for Halloween, including the following items for this year.


itty bittys® The Walking Dead Plush, Collectors Set of 4 (https://www.hallmark.com/gifts/stuffed-animals/itty-bittys/itty-bittys-the-walking-dead-plush-collectors-set-of-4-1KDD1306.html)


and

itty bittys® Tim Burton's The Nightmare Before Christmas Jack Skellington and Sally Stuffed Animals, Set of 2 (https://www.hallmark.com/gifts/stuffed-animals/itty-bittys/itty-bittys-tim-burtons-the-nightmare-before-christmas-jack-skellington-and-sally-stuffed-animals-set-of-2-1KDD1366.html)







CFP Breaking out of the Box: Critical Essays on the Cult TV Show Supernatural (10/2/2017)

Sorry to hvave missed this earlier. I wish them well.
 
UPDATE: CFP Breaking out of the Box: Critical Essays on the Cult TV Show Supernatural
Discussion published by Dominick Grace on Saturday, September 2, 2017
https://networks.h-net.org/node/13784/discussions/193064/update-cfp-breaking-out-box-critical-essays-cult-tv-show

Type: Call for Papers
Date: October 2, 2017
Subject Fields: Cultural History / Studies, Popular Culture Studies, Theatre & Performance History / Studies, Humanities, Film and Film History


Lisa Macklem and Dominick Grace seek proposals for a refereed collection of essays on the CW cult horror show Supernatural, to be published by McFarland.

“What’s in the box?” Dean Winchester asks in “The Magnificent Seven,” episode one of the third season of Supernatural, to the befuddlement of his brother Sam and their avuncular mentor Bobby Singer, but to the delight of fans who revel in the show’s wry meta elements. Dean is of course quoting Detective Mills, Brad Pitt’s character in the thriller Se7en (1995), directed by David Fincher. Throughout its twelve-year run (to date), Supernatural has revelled in breaking out of the limitations usually implied by a television show, breaking out of the box in numerous ways. Acknowledging the popularity of the meta-play in the show, current showrunner Andrew Dabb promised the most meta-finale ever for the season twelve finale. One of the most noteworthy examples of this predilection is the extensively meta elements of the season five apocalypse plotline, which featured the character Carver Edlund (his name derived from series writers Jeremy Carver and Ben Edlund) in several episodes. Edlund is a novelist who has written supposed works of fiction that in fact document Sam and Dean Winchester’s lives, thoroughly breaking the fourth wall. Edlund is the pseudonym of Chuck Shurley—who turns out to be God, making one of his rare mainstream television appearances. However, this meta plot element represents only one of the myriad ways Supernatural has broken out of the box. Season five, episode eight (“Changing Channels”), transports Sam and Dean into the worlds of several television shows, while season six, episode fifteen, “The French Mistake,” carried the conceit further, having Sam and Dean visit the “real” world, in which they are characters in the TV show Supernatural. Season eight and nine feature as main villain the appropriately-named Metatron, the scribe of God trying to write himself into the position of God—in effect plotting in both senses of the word. Season eight also featured, in episode 8 (“Hunteri Heroici”), Warner Brothers style cartoon gimmickry, and the upcoming season thirteen promises an animated crossover episode with Scooby Doo. Season ten’s 200th episode is yet another recursive metanarrative, featuring a highschool student trying to mount a musical adaptation of the Carver Edlund novels. In short, despite its horror trappings, Supernatural has been decidedly postmodern in its liberal use of pastiche, meta, intertextuality, and generic slippage. This collection is interested in exploring the ways Supernatural breaks boundaries. Topics of potential interest include but are not limited to


  • Explicitly meta elements in Supernatural
  • Supernatural and fandom: interpenetrations
  • God, Metatron, and other Supernatural authors
  • Role and role-playing
  • Generic slippage (comedy; found footage; the musical episode)
  • Allusion and intertext in Supernatural
  • Canonicity
  • Non-Supernatural (e.g. the episodes with no fantasy elements)
  • Supernatural and genre TV
  • reality and retcon: how the show has shifted and redefined its own rules
  • casting and self-consciousness (e.g. the use of celebrity guest stars such as Linda Blair, Rick Springfield, etc.)
  • Importance of music throughout the show


Proposals of 300-500 words should be submitted to Lisa Macklem (lmacklem1@gmail.com) or Dominick Grace (dgrace2@uwo.ca) by October 1 2017. Completed papers are also welcome. Final papers should be between 5,000 and 7,000 words long and written in conformity with MLA style and will be due by May 1 2018.

Contact Info:

Dominick Grace

1285 Western Rd

London On

N6G 1H2

Contact Email:
dgrace2@uwo.ca


Friday, September 8, 2017

CFP Trump-Era Horror Book (Last Call for Abstracts) (9/30/2017)

Trump-Era Horror Book (Last Call for Abstracts)
https://call-for-papers.sas.upenn.edu/cfp/2017/09/07/trump-era-horror-book-last-call-for-abstracts

deadline for submissions: September 30, 2017

 contact email: v.mccollum@ulster.ac.uk



Title: Make America Hate Again: Trump-Era Horror & the Politics of Fear

Collection Editor: Dr Victoria McCollum (Ulster University)

Deadline for Abstracts: September 30, 2017

Contact: v.mccollum@ulster.ac.uk

Publisher: Routledge

Summary: Make America Hate Again: Trump-Era Horror and the Politics of Fear explores the intersection of film, politics, and American culture and society through a bold critical analysis of popular horror films/TV produced in the Trump era, such as Green Room (2015); The Witch (2015); Don’t Breathe (2016); The Purge: Election Year (2016); American Gods (2017); American Horror Story (2017); Get Out (2017); and The Handmaid’s Tale (2017). This collection of essays will explore how popular horror scrutinises and unravels the events, anxieties, discourses, dogmas and socio-political conflicts of the Trump years.

Lots of additional information/inspiration can be found here: https://popcultstudies.wordpress.com/

Last updated September 7, 2017

CFP Monstrous Monarchs/Royal Monsters (11/1/2017; Las Vegas 4/12-15/2018)

Monstrous Monarchs/Royal Monsters
https://call-for-papers.sas.upenn.edu/cfp/2017/09/03/monstrous-monarchsroyal-monsters

deadline for submissions: November 1, 2017

full name / name of organization: MEARCSTAPA

contact email: tmtomaini@gmail.com



MEARCSTAPA

Call for Papers

Medieval Association of the Pacific

Annual Conference in Las Vegas, NV

“Memory and Remembrance in the Middle Ages and Renaissance”

12-15 April 2018



Monstrous Monarchs/Royal Monsters


Medieval and early modern societies defined monstrosity in a multitude of ways, assigning the term to figures representing the supernatural “other” and to those representing human alterities. Monsters filled the national consciousness of societies throughout the medieval and early modern worlds. Indeed, the monster became an allegory for a society’s relativisms and fears. So, what happens when the monster is the monarch him or herself—or when the monster is a member of the royal family? How might the term be defined differently or specifically for the sake of this unique person? What special circumstances might be attached to the term and its parameters when the monarch and his or her relationship to the State and its people is concerned? Monarchs of the medieval and early modern periods were deeply concerned about their legacies, and prioritized the public memory of their reigns and dynasties very highly. Similarly, literary and artistic representations of royalty and monarchs often showcase the concerns of dynasty, heredity, and reputation. How is public memory affected when the monarch, or a member of a royal dynasty, is remembered as monstrous for posterity? Moreover, how is royal legacy affected when the term “monster” becomes attached to the monarch while he or she is still living?

MEARCSTAPA invites proposals in all disciplines of the humanities and for all nations, regions, language groups, and cultures of the medieval and early modern periods globally. Please send proposals of 250 words maximum to Asa Mittman asmittman@csuchico.edu, Thea Tomaini tmtomaini@gmail.com, and Ilan Mitchell-Smith Ilan.mitchellsmith@csulb.edu by 1 November 2017.


Last updated September 7, 2017

CFP Monsters and Monstrosity, A Special Issue of The Popular Culture Studies Journal (12/1/2017)

CfP: Monsters and Monstrosity, A Special Issue of The Popular Culture Studies Journal
Posted on September 5, 2017
https://www.fantastic-arts.org/2017/cfp-monsters-and-monstrosity-a-special-issue-of-the-popular-culture-studies-journal/ 

Call for Papers: Monsters and Monstrosity A Special Issue of The Popular Culture Studies Journal

Thanks to Norma Jones for supporting special issue. Please consider submitting and share widely.

Call for Papers: Monsters and Monstrosity
A Special Issue of The Popular Culture Studies Journal
Guest Editor: Bernadette Marie Calafell, University of Denver

Scholars, such as W. Scott Poole and Kendall Phillips, have argued that monsters, particularly those in horror, reflect or correspond to the cultural anxieties of a society. These cultural anxieties are often connected to struggles for power around race, class, gender, sexuality, and ability. Thus, historical context and power are central to studies of monstrosity. Given that we are immersed in what may be considered a horror renaissance, both in film and television, increasing violence against people of color in the U.S., and dangerous and toxic performances of white femininity and masculinity, this is a ripe moment to explore the relationship between monstrosity and popular culture, both literally and figuratively. Thus, this special issues solicits manuscripts that take interdisciplinary approaches to explore the theoretical and methodological possibilities of monstrosity. What can employing monstrosity as a theoretical framework or analytical tool contribute to the study of popular culture? Key questions driving this special issue include: What can monstrosity teach us about Otherness? How can it be used resistively? Conversely, how can monstrosity be used as a tool of oppression? In what ways we can be unpack figures, such as Donald Trump, through the lens of monstrosity? What constitutes monstrosity? How might we understand history differently through the construct of monstrosity? What are the necessary future directions for the study of monstrosity and popular culture? Critical rhetorical, critical qualitative (including critical auto-methodologies), and performative approaches to monstrosity are welcomed.

Potential areas of interest include, but are not limited to:

  • Twin Peaks and monstrosity
  • Monstrosity and comics
  • David Lynch’s uses of monstrosity
  • NBC’s Hannibal
  • Adult Swim
  • Monstrous remakes
  • History and monstrosity
  • Afrofuturism and monstrosity
  • Monstrosity and agency
  • Monstrous bodies
  • Monstrous consumption
  • Monstrosity and adolescence
  • Monstrosity, menstruation, or menopause
  • Fatness and monstrosity
  • Excess and monstrosity
  • Chicanxfuturism and monstrosity
  • Celebrity culture and monstrosity
  • Performance and monstrosity
  • Wrestling and monstrosity
  • Intersectional approaches to monstrosity
  • Feminist possibilities of monstrosity
  • American Horror Story
  • Queerness and monstrosity
  • Monstrosity and sports
  • Disability and monstrosity
  • Class and monstrosity
  • Game of Thrones
  • Monstrous politicians and politics
  • The 2016 U.S. Presidential election
  • Autobiography and monstrosity
  • Monstrous methodologies
  • Hybridity and monstrosity
  • White femininity and monstrosity
  • Monstrosity and military culture
  • Monstrosity and toxic masculinities
  • Monstrosity and white masculinity
  • Monstrosity and religion
  • Monstrosity and temporality
  • Chicana feminism and monstrosity
  • Monstrosity and Orientalism

Questions can be directed to Bernadette Calafell at Bernadette.Calafell@du.edu. Please electronically send submissions (three documents, MS WORD, MLA) to Bernadette Calafell via email at Bernadette.Calafell@du.edu by December 1, 2017.

1) Title Page: A single title page must accompany the email, containing complete contact information (address, phone number, e-mail address).

2) Manuscript: On the first page of the manuscript, only include the article’s title, being sure not to include the author’s name. The journal employs a “blind review” process, meaning that a copy of the article will be sent to reviewers without revealing the author’s name. Please include the works cited with your manuscript.

3) Short Bio: On a separate document, please also include a short (100 words) bio. We will include this upon acceptance and publication.

Essays should range between 15-25 pages of double-spaced text in 12 pt. Times New Roman font, including all images, endnotes, and Works Cited pages. Please note that the 15-page minimum should be 15 pages of written article material. Less than 15 pages of written material will be rejected and the author asked to develop the article further. Essays should also be written in clear US English in the active voice and third person, in a style accessible to the broadest possible audience. Authors should be sensitive to the social implications of language and choose wording free of discriminatory overtones.

For documentation, The Popular Culture Studies Journal follows the Modern Language Association style, as articulated by Joseph Gibaldi and Walter S. Achtert in the paperback MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers (New York: MLA), and in The MLA Style Manual (New York: MLA). The most current editions of both guides will be the requested editions for use. This style calls for a Works Cited list, with parenthetical author/page references in the text. This approach reduces the number of notes, which provide further references or explanation.

For punctuation, capitalization, hyphenation, and other matters of style, follow the MLA Handbook and the MLA Style Manual, supplemented as necessary by The Chicago Manual of Style (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). The most current edition of the guide will be the requested edition for use.

It is essential for authors to check, correct, and bring manuscripts up to date before final submission. Authors should verify facts, names of people, places, and dates, and double-check all direct quotations and entries in the Works Cited list. Manuscripts not in MLA style will be returned without review.

We are happy to receive digital artwork. Please save line artwork (vector graphics) as Encapsulated PostScript (EPS) and bitmap files (halftones or photographic images) as Tagged Image Format (TIFF), with a resolution of at least 300 dpi at final size. Do not send native file formats. Please contact the editor for discussion of including artwork.

Upon acceptance of a manuscript, authors are required to sign a form transferring the copyright from the author to the publisher. A copy will be sent to authors at the time of acceptance.

Before final submission, the author will be responsible for obtaining letters of permission for illustrations and for quotations that go beyond “fair use,” as defined by current copyright law.

Saturday, September 2, 2017

CFP Horror Area (10/1/2017; PCA 2018)

Horror Area
http://pcaaca.org/horror/

All Proposals & Abstracts Must Be Submitted Through The PCA Conference Submission page
Please submit a proposal to only one area at a time. Exceptions and rules


CALL FOR PAPERS

The Horror Area co-chairs of the Popular Culture Association invite interested scholars to submit proposals for papers or complete panels on any aspect of horror in fiction, cinema, television, gaming, theory, and culture.

Your paper proposal should include:

1) 100- to 250-word abstract, including paper title;
2) a notification of any audio-visual needs.

Your panel or roundtable proposal should include:

1) suggested panel/roundtable title;
2) 100- to 250-word abstract identifying the theoretical framework, or guiding questions and thesis of your panel/roundtable;
3) 100- to 250-word abstracts, including titles, for each of your presenters’ papers;
4) a list of presenters and their affiliations;
5) a notification of any audio-visual needs.

Please note that proposals that are overly general are difficult to review; accordingly, your abstract should outline your main argument or research questions, your thesis and main points, and your projected conclusions.

Submitting the same or various proposals to different subject areas of the PCA is not allowed. Presenters are, however, permitted to submit proposals for both a roundtable discussion and a panel presentation. Acceptance of your paper obligates you to present the paper at the conference. You must also be present at the conference to present your own work—no “readings by proxy” are allowed.

Important: All presenters 1) must be registered members of the PCA or ACA and 2) must register for the conference. Information on how to access membership and registration forms will be sent to you upon acceptance of your presentation. Or, go now to the PCA/ACA website: http://pcaaca.org/national-conference-2/instructions-for-the-submission-database/.

Deadline: Submit your paper proposal/abstract through the PCA/ACA submission page by October 1st, 2017, to be considered for the 2018 PCA/ACA Annual National Conference in Indianapolis, Indiana.

Please send all inquiries to:

Jim Iaccino
The Chicago School of Prof. Psychology
pcahorror@gmail.com

Tiffany A. Bryant
pcahorror@gmail.com