Showing posts with label 19th Century. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 19th Century. Show all posts

Thursday, March 2, 2023

CFP Nightmare/s in the Long Nineteenth Century Collection (3/15/2023)


Nightmare/s in the Long Nineteenth Century (CFP for edited volume)


deadline for submissions:
March 15, 2023

full name / name of organization:
Frances Clemente/University of Oxford; Greta Colombani/University of Cambridge

contact email:
nightmaresconference@gmail.com

source: https://call-for-papers.sas.upenn.edu/cfp/2022/12/19/nightmares-in-the-long-nineteenth-century-cfp-for-edited-volume.



Nightmare/s in the Long Nineteenth Century


(CFP for edited volume)




Building on the exciting multidisciplinary conference held last May 2022 at King’s College, University of Cambridge, funded by the Open-Oxford-Cambridge AHRC Doctoral Training Partnership, we would like to invite proposals for essays to be included in an edited collection titled Nightmare/s in the Long Nineteenth Century.

The collection aims to explore the rich and multifaceted theme of nightmare in the arts, thought, and culture of the long nineteenth century. From Johann Heinrich Füssli’s 1781 oil painting The Nightmare, which was to become the iconic image of a newly emergent sensibility, to the first psychoanalytic investigations culminating in the Freudian study On the Nightmare by Ernest Jones (first published in 1911), the nineteenth century was characterised by a pervasive fascination with nightmares both as frightening dreams and, in their personified form, terrifying creatures or spirits (like the incubus).

Described by Samuel T. Coleridge as “not a mere Dream” but a peculiar oneiric phenomenon taking place “during a rapid alternation, a twinkling as it were, of sleeping and waking”, in the course of the nineteenth century the nightmare raised fundamental questions about conscience, the mind, fear, the Other, and the fear of the Other.

It occupied a special place in “the mythology of the Gothic imagination” (Philip W. Martin) not only because nightmares abounded in Gothic texts but also, and more significantly, because some of the most famous works in this genre – such as Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818) and Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1886) – allegedly had their origins in their author’s nightmares. As “a phenomenon of passivity, self-effacement, irrationality, terror, and erotic excess” (Lisa Downing), the nightmare also conveyed cultural anxieties about repressed and deviant aspects of sexuality, as exemplified by another Füssli’s painting, the sapphic An Incubus Leaving Two Sleeping Girls (c. 1793), and by Louis Dubosquet’s definition of the nightmare as a nervous illness similar to hysteria in his medical thesis Dissertation sur le cauchemar (1815). Additionally, the age of imperialism witnessed the rise of ‘colonial nightmares’ which haunted Western imagination and gave voice to fears of racial otherness, as can be seen in “Lukundoo”, an American short story written in 1907 by Edward Lucas White about an explorer cursed by an African witch doctor and based on the authors’ own nightmares.

We invite proposals for contributions from various disciplines across the arts & humanities, with different methodological approaches and different geographical focus areas. Topics may include but are not restricted to:



● 19th-century literary and artsitic representations of nightmares

● 19th-century psychological and medical understanding of nightmares;

● nightmares and sleep

● nightmares and the unconscious

● nightmares and the Gothic;

● nightmares, inspiration, and the creative mind;

● nightmares, eroticism, and sexuality;

● nightmares and spectral apparitions;

● nightmares and hallucinations

● nightmares, altered states of consciousness, and psychoactive substances;

●nightmares and madness;

●prophetic nightmares;

●nightmares and the fear of (racial, ethnic, social, sexual…) Otherness;

●19th-century non-Western conceptions and depictions of nightmares.



Abstracts of 500 words, together with a short bio (max. 200 words), due March 15 2023 (notification of outcome by May 2023).

Final essays of 7.000-10.000 words, due September 15 2023.



All materials to be submitted to nightmaresconference@gmail.com.



With all best wishes,



The editors,

Frances Clemente (University of Oxford)

Greta Colombani (University of Cambridge)



Last updated December 20, 2022

Friday, April 22, 2022

CFP Recycling the Gothic: Adaptations in the Romantic-Era Marketplace (Spec Issue of Literature 8/5/2022)

My thanks to Open Grave, Open Minds for the head's up on this and a number of posts today.



Special Issue "Recycling the Gothic: Adaptations in the Romantic-Era Marketplace"


Print Special Issue Flyer
Special Issue Editors
Special Issue Information
Keywords
Published Papers

A special issue of Literature (ISSN 2410-9789).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 5 August 2022.



Special Issue Editor


Prof. Dr. Franz Potter E-Mail Website SciProfiles
Guest Editor

Arts and Humanities Department, College of Letters and Sciences, National University, San Diego, CA 92123, USA
Interests: Gothic literature; nineteenth-century Gothic chapbooks; trade Gothic; Gothic publishing industry; the author Sarah Wilkinson


Special Issue Information



Dear Colleagues,

We invite submissions for a Special Issue of Literature focusing on adaptations of Gothic texts in the Romantic-era marketplace. From its inception, the Gothic tradition has been built upon a framework of familiar set themes, motifs and characterizations, such as the use of geographically and temporally displaced settings, an emphasis on terror and horror, the exploitation of the supernatural and, significantly, techniques of literary suspense. This framework was then recycled, imitated, redacted, adapted, manipulated and restructured into new and interesting novels, chapbooks, short stories and serials. As Frederick Frank in The First Gothics observed, ‘the Gothic in all its stages and mutations is a highly parasitic form; Gothics shamelessly feed on the literary remains of previous Gothic, theft of material is a universal law of composition, and the line between crafty imitation and over plagiarism is often so weak that it breaks down entirely…’ (p. xii).

This Special Issue seeks to examine adaptations of the Gothic in all forms, from the novel to the short story, chapbooks and serialized publications. It will explore the recycling of essential elements of the Gothic as a sign of activity and innovation rather than monotony and stagnation. The recycling of the Gothic, whether specific motifs and characterizations or stories themselves, reveals continual interest and engagement between the author and the reader. This distinction is important not only because it allows recycling to be seen as crucial to the growth and sustainability of the Gothic, but also because it allows the Gothic tradition to continue to be viewed in the larger context of evolving discourses.

We are interested in papers that focus on topics such as, but not limited to:
  • Adaptation vs. imitation.
  • The recycling of Gothic motifs and tropes.
  • Chapbook adaptions of Gothic novels.
  • Re-examination of authors such as Eliza Parsons, Mary Meeke, Francis Lathom, Sarah Wilkinson and Charlotte Dacre.
  • Formulaic Gothic.
  • Imitations of Radcliffe and Lewis.
  • The critical divide between the Gothic canon and the trade Gothic.
  • Gothic short stories.
  • Gothic adaptations of dramas.
  • Gothic chapbooks to novels.
  • The Gothic in periodicals such as Marvellous Magazine or Tell-Tale Magazine.
  • Gothic dramas.
  • Publishers of Gothic novels and chapbooks, including Ann Lemoine and Thomas Tegg.
  • Gothic book trade.
  • Female authorship.

Prof. Dr. Franz Potter
Guest Editor



Manuscript Submission Information




Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Literature is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.


Keywords


Gothic
adaptations
chapbooks
abridgements
book trade
publishers
terror
female authorship
Ann Radcliffe
Matthew Lewis

Published Papers

This special issue is now open for submission.

Thursday, March 17, 2022

CFP Victorian Necropolitics (Spec Issue of Victoriographies: A Journal of Nineteenth-Century Writing, 1790-1914 ) (4/15/2022)

CFP: Special Issue of Victoriographies: A Journal of Nineteenth-Century Writing, 1790-1914 “Victorian Necropolitics” (Deadline: 4/15/2022)

posted by NAVSA on FEB 24, 2022

source: https://navsa.org/2022/02/24/cfp-special-issue-of-victoriographies-a-journal-of-nineteenth-century-writing-1790-1914-victorian-necropolitics-deadline-4-15-2022/

CFP: Special Issue of Victoriographies: A Journal of Nineteenth-Century Writing, 1790-1914 “Victorian Necropolitics” (Deadline: 4/15/2022)


Proposal Deadline: April 15, 2022

In his essay (2003) and later book Necropolitics, (2019) Achille Mbembe used the term ‘necropolitics’ to account for the cruel relationship between life and death in colonial contexts, as well as the subsequent production of 'death worlds' within postcolonial, geopolitical spaces. Mbembe argues that biopower, in its desire to distinguish between who is disposable and who must be protected, produces a corollary power termed 'necropower.' This sovereign power maximizes the destruction of people and creates 'deathscapes' or 'death worlds,' 'unique forms of social existence in which vast populations are subjected to conditions of life which confer upon them the status of the living dead' (2003). According to Mbembe, colonies, plantations, and slavery are the chief nineteenth-century examples of necropolitics, and current systems of terrorism are its descendents. Mbembe’s concepts can be insightfully deployed to investigate how slavery is instituted and resisted, how British colonization contributes to a state of exception that makes these uses of death possible, and how rebellions, discourses, and histories contain, rebel against, or propagate uses of death. While Mbembe centers his project on slave plantations in the West Indies and the colonial horrors of his native West Africa, his thanatotic, corpse politics are certainly relevant to nineteenth-century Western culture, specifically in the examination of the necropolitical construction of the British Empire onto the inhabitants and landscape of England, for instance, as an example of a re-enacting or reversal of the horrors of the imperial system.

Following Mbembe, we have seen a broader expansion of necropolitical theory to diverse fields, such as ecology, architecture, and queer studies. Jasbir Puar (2014) elaborates a queer necropolitics which calls attention to the ‘differences between queer subjects who are being folded (back) into life and the racialized queernesses that emerge through the naming of populations, often those marked for death.’ With this capaciousness, necropolitics involves multiple modalities of power deployment over the production and management of dead bodies.

This special issue “Victorian Necropolitics” seeks to complicate and expand the postcolonial and posthuman interrogations launched by Mbembe, Rosi Braidotti (2013) and others.

Proposals might address but are not limited to the following topics:

• The aesthetics of violence and fear

• Urban life, surveillance, and regulating mechanisms

• Necro tendencies in architecture, interior, and object design

• Necropower, industrialization, and capitalism

• Queer Necropolitics, Ecologies, and/or Thanatologies

• Necro/dark economies

• Necro ecologies

• The Undead and/or Posthuman

• Imperialism, slavery, and the war machine

• Death and law

• Necropolitics of state racism

• Social death in literature

The suggested topics may be interpreted widely and are intended to encompass a broad range of fields in Victorian studies. Please send a 300-500 word abstract briefly outlining your proposed 7000-8000 word essay with the subject heading “Victorian Necropolitics” and a brief biography to Jolene Zigarovich: jzigarov@gmail.com by 15 April 2022. Notifications of the outcome of submissions will be by early May 2022. If accepted, essays will be due 1 October 2022. The special issue will then be sent to Victoriographies for review and approval. Further details about the journal and a style guide for submissions are available at https://www.euppublishing.com/page/vic/submissions.


Tuesday, January 12, 2021

CFP Victorian Inclusion and Exclusion (2/28/21; Victorian Popular Fiction Association Conference virtual 7/14-16/2021)

Victorian Inclusion and Exclusion

full name / name of organization: 
Victorian Popular Fiction Association
 
contact email: 

We invite a broad, imaginative and interdisciplinary interpretation on the topic of ‘Victorian Inclusion and Exclusion’ and its relation to any aspect of Victorian popular literature and culture that addresses literal or metaphorical representations of the theme. Inter- and multidisciplinary approaches are welcome, as are papers that address poetry, drama, global literature, non-fiction, visual arts, journalism, historical and social contexts. Papers addressing works from the ‘long Victorian period’ (i.e. before 1837 and after 1901) and on neo-Victorian texts/media are also welcome.

Please send proposals for 20-minute papers, panels of three papers (by individual scholars, or affiliated with another Learned Society), or non-traditional papers/panels, on topics that can include, but are not limited to:

  • Canonicity, canon formation and critical recovery (neo-Victorian subjects and texts, pedagogical selections, redressing of Victorian imbalances); ‘inclusion’ in collections/short story anthologies/series;
  • 19th-century ideas of taste and cultural value, high-culture/popular culture divide; the theatre, circus, music hall, opera; three-volume novel, penny bloods, railway literature;
  • Generic inclusivity/hybridity; genre boundaries and transmedia; 
  • Equality, diversity and inclusion;
  • Sex and gender inclusion and exclusion – domestic spheres, marriage, the ‘third sex’, institutions, workplaces, religious ideas;
  • Class inclusion and exclusion – extension of the franchise, organization of labour, class war, exclusionary social mores, poverty and economic inclusion/exclusion;
  • Disability, mental health, medical treatments and discourse;
  • Racial inclusion and exclusion – Anglo-European racial discourse/pseudo-science, non-Anglo-European racial discourse and practices, imperial ideology and practice, colonial institutions, trans-colonial and global migration, segregated travel;
  • National inclusion and exclusion – intra-European alliances and antagonisms, Anglo-American co-operation;
  • Geographical spaces, boundaries, borders and liminality;
  • Family inclusion and exclusion – family unit, ageing, adoption, orphans;
  • Verbal exclusion – gossip, slander, rumour, reputation;
  • Inclusive organizations – self-help groups, working men’s clubs/libraries/institutes, literary clubs, social clubs and societies;
  • Classification and categorization, anthropology, ethnography, the natural world;
  • Exclusion and exile (Wilde); prisons and prison reform; deportation;
  • Self-exclusion – breakaway social groups: ideal communities, anarchists, utopians;
  • Educational inclusion/exclusion – schools/universities, expulsion, technology-enabled inclusion and exclusion in the (online) classroom; teaching online pedagogy;
  • Other forms of inclusion and exclusion – religious; discourse on/treatment of children, animals, wider non-human world;
  • The role exclusion plays in facilitating horror and Gothic fiction, boundaries between life and death, Imperial Gothic and Euro-sceptic horror, Irish Gothic and invasion.

Please send proposals of no more than 300 words, a 50 word biography, twitter handle (if you have one) and your availability/time zones over the conference dates in Word format to Drs Anne-Marie Beller, Ailise Bulfin, Janine Hatter and Erin Louttit at: vpfaconference@gmail.com.  

If accepted, audio/visual presentations of 15 minutes or written papers of c.2000 words should be submitted by Monday 14th June, 2021. This is well in advance of the conference, so that delegates can read/watch the presentations in advance, ready for the Q&A discussions which are live at the conference. Speakers should be members of the VPFA and there will be a minimal cost for the conference to offset technical support.

PGR/Unwaged Fee Waivers

In addition, to acknowledge the financial hardship many scholars are facing as a result of COVID-19, we will exceptionally be offering 3 waivers of the student/unwaged registration fee for those whose proposals are accepted. These waivers are intended for postgraduate students, postdoctoral scholars, independent scholars and precarious academics who at the moment of application do not hold a permanent position. If you wish to be considered for a registration fee waiver, when submitting your abstract, bio and (if applicable) Twitter handle, please include a statement of no more than 60 words as to why you are applying for the waiver. As per the spirit of the VPFA constitution, we want the conference to be open to as many researchers as possible, regardless of means.

VPFA website link: http://victorianpopularfiction.org/vpfa-annual-conference/.


Last updated November 4, 2020

 

CFP Neo-Victorian and the Late Victorian Conference (4/27/21; Brighton, Eng. 9/2-3/21)

 This might be a repeated post.

The Neo-Victorian and the Late Victorian

full name / name of organization: 
Dr Victoria Margree / University of Brighton
 
contact email: 

Due to the ongoing situation with the Covid-19 pandemic, the conference organisers have decided to postpone the event by one year and plan to run it in early September 2021. The specific dates will be confirmed in due time but we hope to run it during the ones equivalent to those currently scheduled. For the next academic year, that would be 2-3 September 2021, TBC.

Our CFP remains active and so is our inbox (neovictorian@brighton.ac.uk) for abstracts or any queries related to the event. We accept abstracts by 27 April 2021.

We are also delighted to announce our first keynote speaker for the event, Associate Professor Dr Claire Nally from Northumbria University, author of Steampunk: Gender, Subculture and the Neo-Victorian (2019).

 

Call for Papers

 The last few decades have witnessed an increasing interest in revisiting, reproducing or rewriting various aspects of nineteenth-century culture, particularly that of the late Victorian period, whether in the form of neo-Victorian literature, steampunk, media archaeology, fashion, documentaries and period dramas, among others. This trend has received various different interpretations, either as part of the recycling of past periods, styles and texts characteristic of postmodernism of the 1980s, of the ‘memory boom’ of the 1990s and the ensuing culture of commemoration, anniversaries and memorialisation, or the most recent signs of a widespread imperial nostalgia, evident not just in various media texts, such as film or television, but also in contemporary political realities like Brexit. These are only some of the symptoms of this widespread trend and only some instances of the critical approaches that they have received, and this two-day conference seeks to explore this trend from a diverse range of disciplinary, theoretical and methodological perspectives. The specific focus of the conference is on papers that address the dialectic relationship between the two historical periods. We are particularly interested in the ways in which the late-Victorian is re-envisioned and reconceptualised within the neo-Victorian. The list below is only indicative of areas for which we welcome submission of abstracts:

  • neo-Victorianism in literature, film and television
  • Gothic horror, then and now: literature, film, television and gaming
  • steampunk (literature, art, fashion, subculture)
  • contemporary politics and imperial nostalgia (Empire 2.0, Global Britain, etc.)
  • media archaeology, archive studies, museums and the late Victorian ‘frenzy of the visible’
  • contemporary sexual politics and late Victorian queer cultures
  • The New Woman and the suffragette movement
  • contemporary terrorism and the 1890s
  • crime, detection and punishment
  • nostalgia and material culture: the yearning for the handmade

Please send 300-word abstracts accompanied by a 90-word bio to conference organisers Victoria Margree and Aris Mousoutzanis by 27 April 2021 at neovictorian@brighton.ac.uk

And you will find regular updates at this site:

http://blogs.brighton.ac.uk/neovictorian/


Last updated May 28, 2020

 

CFP Reimagining the Victorians (3/1/21; Spec Issue of Victorians Institute Journal)

Reimagining the Victorians

https://call-for-papers.sas.upenn.edu/cfp/2020/11/02/reimagining-the-victorians

deadline for submissions:
March 1, 2021


full name / name of organization:
Victorians Institute Journal


contact email:
vij@mtsu.edu




Special Issue of Victorians Institute Journal:

Reimagining the Victorians

   The success of the recent movie, The Personal History of David Copperfield (2020), featuring a racially diverse cast, has renewed the discussion of how we, in the twenty-first century, have re-imagined the nineteenth century and its culture through our adaptation and remediation of Edwardian and Victorian texts and figures. Across media, for example, Sherlock Holmes may be found stalking the streets of London in both period costume and modern dress (sometimes with a newly invented younger sister), while the multi-talented Elizabeth Bennett can be re-discovered (a) demurely preparing for a ball, (b) quaffing wine and chain-smoking as Bridget Jones, (c) dancing wildly in a Bollywood production number, and even (d) fiercely battling zombies. Carson the butler silently patrols the halls of Downton Abbey exuding decorum, while Andrew Lloyd Webber brings all the sensationalism of The Woman in White to a melodically thrilling, faux-operatic musical, and the versatile Johnny Depp warbles as the Demon of Fleet Street in the horror-musical Sweeney Todd and cavorts as the Mad Hatter in the live-action/animated version of Alice in Wonderland. Royal biography becomes soap opera in Victoria, royally entertaining and addictive, if not always historically accurate, while in the latest adaptation of Frances Hodgson Burnett’s The Secret Garden, we are not only transported into the boundlessness of a child’s imagination but also into a grim post-WWII era. Ellen Ternan, Euphemia Gray, and the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood have had their lives transformed into biopics (The Silent Woman, Effie Gray, The Desperate Romantics), while Jonathan Whicher, who was fictionalized by both Dickens and Wilkie Collins, was returned to reality and grounded in a popular biography, a biography that subsequently was adapted into a film that launched Whicher back into a series of fictional adventures, transforming him once again into the figure of super detective.  The genre-bending list of sequels, prequels, and spinoffs is almost endless—Mr. Rochester, Mr. Dick, Mr. Timothy, Death and Mr. Pickwick, Olivia Twist, Dodger, Drood, The Last Dickens, Penny Dreadful, Ripper Street, Becoming Jane Eyre, Alice I Have Been, and so on. To make sense of these diverse adaptations, Victorians Institute Journal invites submissions for a special issue featuring essays examining our twenty-first century perspective of the long nineteenth century. Essays might focus on twenty-first century novels (original fiction as well as sequels, prequels, and adaptations of canonical works), films, musicals and stage productions, TV series, graphic novels, fan fiction, video games, and biographical fiction. Papers should be 5000-8000 words in length and follow the Chicago Manual of Style. Submissions (in Microsoft Word) and inquiries should be emailed to the editors (Maria K. Bachman and Don Richard Cox) at vij@mtsu.edu.  Submissions must be received by March 1, 2021.


Last updated November 4, 2020